Thomas Paine's writings are often overlooked when individuals discuss the history, origin and the evolution of American government policy. However it is import to reevaluate his key points, communicated to a populace that was mostly under educated and un familiar with political philosophy. An essay of common sense written for the common people. :
Paine argued that government is a necessary evil that exists only to provide security and protect the people from their own vices. Its primary purpose is to safeguard life, liberty, and property, but it should be kept as minimal as possible to prevent it from becoming oppressive.
Critique of Monarchy and Hereditary Succession: Paine criticized the concept of monarchy, particularly hereditary succession, as absurd and unnatural. He argued that no person should have power over others simply by accident of birth, and that such a system is inherently corrupt and unjust. In today's modern context one could consider this an objection to family political oligarchies in all forms, National or even in the smallest rural communities, Hereditary Succession, is a corruption of government
Advocacy for Republicanism: Paine advocated for a republican form of government where the people hold the power and elect their leaders. He believed that a government based on the consent of the governed would be more just and effective than a monarchy. But it must maintain that consent through honest and openly democratic means.
The Absurdity of an Island Ruling a Continent: Paine pointed out the absurdity of a small island like Britain ruling over a vast continent like America. He argued that it was unnatural and impractical for a distant power to effectively govern such a large and diverse territory. In todays context, one may argue the absurdity of a city like Washington DC to rule over a continent, or a single entity to rule over such a vast diversity of people today.
Economic Self-Sufficiency: Paine emphasized that America was economically capable of sustaining itself without Britain. He pointed out the abundant resources and the potential for trade with other nations, arguing that independence would lead to economic prosperity. Compare and contrast this today with economic globalism and the desire to outsource labor and manufacturing today and if this is benefiting the people who are governed by these policies.
The Impossibility of Reconciliation: Paine argued that reconciliation with Britain was no longer a viable option. He believed that repeated abuses by the British government had destroyed any possibility of a peaceful resolution, making independence the only solution. Today's scholars will have to find a legal and ethical path for resolution if one were to still exists, and perhaps this is the essence and the core purpose of MTALKS. as MTALKS does not believe it is Impossible, that the tools and the means exists, the people must have the will and the desire for change.
The Moral Imperative of Independence: Paine framed the struggle for independence as a moral imperative, arguing that it was the duty of Americans to break free from British tyranny. He believed that the cause of American independence was not just about practical concerns, but also about upholding principles of justice and human rights. This principle, this morality is what makes America, breaking free from tyranny, the ability to recognize it, expose it and disinfect its origin.
The Danger of Continued British Rule: Paine warned that continued British rule would lead to further oppression and conflict. He argued that Britain’s interests were fundamentally at odds with those of the American colonies, and that remaining under British control would only result in more harm and suffering.
The Potential for a New Beginning: Paine saw American independence as an opportunity for a new beginning. He envisioned the creation of a just, democratic society that could serve as a model for the rest of the world. He believed that America had the potential to establish a government that truly represented the people.
Unity and Common Cause: Paine stressed the importance of unity among the colonies. He argued that the struggle for independence was a common cause that transcended regional differences and called on all Americans to join together in the fight for freedom. Unity, by today's standards would seem like a miracle in and unto itself. However, the differences we see amongst ourselves is a fabricated fiction placed there to drive a wedge between us intentionally and purposefully to drive a wedge and fracture the will and the power of a unified people. Which is why, truth and justice for ALL includes not just equality based on immutable characteristics like sex, race, creed but on those occupational characteristics like Judge, Senator, Mayor, Law Enforcement Officer, Teacher, Union Boss, CEO. Justice must be equally enjoyed and can only be such if it is equally enforced.
Hi, this is a comment.
To get started with moderating, editing, and deleting comments, please visit the Comments screen in the dashboard.
Commenter avatars come from Gravatar.